People want to go back to the office… Why?
Sources in this article are from institutions such as the New York Times, the BBC, Reuters, Breitbart, MSN, Yahoo, and NBC, or they're direct sources.
Before the pandemic, I worked in an office. Everyone from my company now works from home. Lately, the people I work with are saying they want to go back.
Why is that?
I’ve grown to hate offices. I’ve worked in them for years. They’re drab environments whether they’re beige or bright blue and orange, and they offer no real outlet for creativity. So, this question bothered me, and it wasn’t until recently that I decided people want to go back to the office because of what an office is.
An office is a place where workers spend most of their time. It’s how they make their money. It’s a necessary evil, which is why, often when you’re new to a job, the best course of action in an office is to try to make yourself as comfortable as possible so you can watch the world drift by in peace––assuming you’re lucky enough to have a window.
I can tell you from experience, office life is more comfortable to start with and in general if you don’t make too many waves. Being that I don’t believe most people want to be at work, I think they try to make the most of it and to get as comfortable as possible while they’re there. In this quest for comfort a lot of people intentionally or unintentionally create a work persona, a version of themselves designed to blend in more, to avoid criticism early on. And I think this only-slightly altered persona spends an inordinate amount of time seeking comfort.
If I’m right, then an office is a sort of prison of the mind, and working from home is house arrest. You’d think house arrest would be preferable to prison.
So, why do the people I work with want to go back?
I believe it’s because office workers spend so much of their lives trying to make an uncomfortable situation a little less so. This answer bothered me because it seemed like it could’ve been this same conditioning that allowed last year to happen…
And what exactly happened last year? That’s what I want to talk about. I want to briefly go over the last year based on mainstream, but under-reported articles. What would last year look like if we didn’t have a google feed, or a facebook feed, or a bunch of subreddits we were subscribed to?
I feel like I would’ve been happier, healthier, but perhaps less curious than I am now. I still can’t help feeling mesmerized by what’s going on around me. It never occurred to me that the world could shut down overnight. Too much money would be lost. Powerful individuals would’ve stopped it, and if they didn’t, big business certainly would’ve. And in trying to sort out why no one did, I’ve come to some deeper conclusions, but before we get to those, there needs to be an anchor we can hang onto. And the rest of this article will serve as just that.
So, chronologically, what happened last year?
A likely place to start looking for answers to that question would be with the death of an alleged LSD lover, a man who didn’t believe HIV caused aids, a man who was married four times, a Nobel prize winner, and, yes, inventor of the PCR test, used so prevalently to detect the Corona virus, Doctor Kary Mullis. Mullis died of pneumonia in August 2019, at the age of 74.
Why is his death important?
Kary Mullis had a lot to say about his test. For this article, all you need to remember is that he said his test shouldn’t be run at over 35 cycles. 35 is an important number for the PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test, because running the tests at over 35 cycles, according to Dr. Mullis, would make them useless, because tests run at 35 cycles or higher would produce false positives far too often to be relied upon––For this article, just remember the number 35, it will be relevant later.
In October of 2019, the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, in partnership with the Johns Hopkins Center and the WEF (World Economic Forum), hosted a global Coronavirus pandemic exercise called “Event 201.” Event 201 was held in New York in front of a live audience and much of the footage is still publicly available on youtube.
This event happened pre-pandemic and mirrored much of what we’ve seen happen since. We’ve seen censorship, global coordination, bailouts for governments and private companies, and we’ve seen media companies quickly “develop the ability to flood media with fast, accurate, and consistent information.”
One participant in the Event 201 simulation tells us that Bill Gates is financing work on algorithms which crawl social media platforms to make sure people can trust the information there. Another participant, George Gao, the head of the Chinese Centre for Disease Control, muses about ways to counter rumors that the virus is man-made.
Aside from the coincidence of this tabletop exercise being about a novel coronavirus, mirroring much of the response to Covid-19, and it taking place shortly before the pandemic, there are no other coincidences.
In March of 2020, the CARES (Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economy Security) act passed. This bill provided $1200.00 to every American over the age of 18. In 2019, there were ~255 million adults in the US. If you use that data to do some funky math, less than 25% of the 2.2 trillion in the CARES act went to individuals. More than that, almost 500 billion dollars, went to a fund for “distressed businesses.” And Steve Mnuchin, treasury secretary and sycophant, according to the Washington Post, was left to manage those funds with little oversite.
The New York Times said about the CARES act, “$454 billion of the package goes toward backing up a new Federal Reserve program that largely benefits big business.”
Do you remember a little way up the page where we gave a brief description of Event 201, which simulated a fictional Corona virus outbreak, took place right before the pandemic, and included such major players as the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, the Johns Hopkins Center, and the WEF, all in order to practice for a real pandemic?
On April 12, 2020, Bill Gates said in an interview with the BBC, “Now here we are. We didn’t simulate this, we didn’t practice, so both the health policies and economic policies, we find ourselves in uncharted territory.”
On May 20, 2020, samples from a piece of fruit and a goat were provided to a Tanzanian lab, by Tanzanian President John Magufuli. The lab tested the Goat and the PawPaw fruit with Corona Virus tests imported from abroad. Both tested positive for Covid-19.
Earlier, I told you to remember that the man who won a Nobel prize for inventing the PCR test said it was useless and would produce a high number of false positives if conducted at over 35 cycles… The World Health Organization must not have looked at the test inventor’s notes before deciding it should be used world wide to asses the number of positive cases and the threat we were all facing, because on August 20, 2020 the WHO recommended that the PCR tests be performed at 50 cycles.
On August 29th the New York Times wrote an article titled Your Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn’t Be. It explained that at least some states in the US were running the test at over 40 cycles.
By late 2020 (but starting much earlier in the year), posts suggesting there was reason to question Covid-19 diagnoses and/or the coming vaccine began being pulled off of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube.
Some of the speech YouTube did away with:
• Claims that there is a guaranteed prevention method for COVID-19
• Claims that any medication or vaccination is a guaranteed prevention method for COVID-19
• Content that recommends use of Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquine for the prevention of COVID-19
• Claims that wearing a mask is dangerous or causes negative physical health effects
• Claims that masks do not play a role in preventing the contraction or transmission of COVID-19
• Claims about COVID-19 vaccinations that contradict expert consensus from local health authorities or WHO
December 20, 2020, the second coronavirus relief package is passed. This one only pays citizens $600 each, even though it costs more than the first stimulus package, at 2.3 trillion dollars. You might remember the controversy here, as one particular piece of overspending got a lot of news coverage. This bill was the one that included things like 10 million dollars for Pakistan Gender Programs, without defining what those were.
March 16, 2021, countries around the globe halt use of the AstraZeneca vaccine because it causes blood clots.
Resolving an issue from earlier in the article… On March 17, 2021, President John Magufuli, of Tanzania, the guy who had the fruit and the goat tested for Covid-19, dies… of Covid-19––suggests the New York Times––while those closest to the President deny reports he’d contracted the virus.
And here are some headlines to quickly close out April 2021 and bring us to the present…
MSN - U.S. Calls for Pause on Johnson & Johnson Vaccine After Blood Clotting Cases
Yahoo - Will the Vaccine Passport Become Summer's Hottest Accessory?
NBC - A third Pfizer dose? The Covid-19 vaccine maker is studying booster shots.
If you’ve read this far and disagreed with any of the above or the way it was presented, thank you for keeping an open mind and at least considering the implications of these reports. If you work in an office you love, thank you for putting up with me slandering office work in general at the beginning of this article. I believe it’s pushing past minor differences and disagreements like these and honestly looking at all the information available that will shed light on the forces at work in the world around us.
Now that we have an anchor point, we can look back to this article in the future and be sure that claims I may make about the Corona virus data being disingenuously manipulated, our tax dollars being stolen, and important speech being censored is based in something close to reality. Future articles will be about why and how this is happening, competing ideologies, and who is really running things––and how many of them are associated with Jeffery Epstein. Hint: Probably all of them, because politicians and lobbyists tend to be terrible people…
I’ll leave you with my favorite casually released article so far this year, which explains that, “researchers found the prevalence of the [Covid-19] variant from South Africa, known as B.1.351, among patients who received two doses of the vaccine was about eight times higher than those who were unvaccinated.”
If you haven’t had enough fear porn for one day, pair the previous article with one about Marek’s disease in chickens and its leaky vaccine…
Until next week, thanks for reading!